The
The public-at-large are not unfamiliar with the carnal misfortune of my unapparelled manhood.
Regular readers will have gagged over their google bars as I described inadvertently flashing a group of amiable Japanese businessmen. And yes, should you have happened to partake in a Massamun Curry on a Hackney side-street in June 2007, that was me bounding along the pavement wearing nothing but a pair of frilly pink knickers and a motley motif of tattoos. Seven takes, that took.
Nope, I’m no prude. However. Here, for your perusal, a parable:
“Once upon a time there were two rising stars, intrepid and talented actors cast in a short film about abortion. Dutifully they attended the eye-wateringly early rehearsals, out beyond the borders of Zone 6; though the director, in his budding professionalism, had neglected to inform their agents of these extra dates, nor were they reimbursed.
The director being Danish —as any aficionado of Lars Von Trier may expect— had a somewhat eccentric approach to rehearsals. Here the telltale whiff of perversion begins to moulder. After a ‘chemistry-homework’ fake-date, they discovered that a film about abortion had suddenly become a film about —in the immortal words of Marvin Gaye— gettin’ it on.
Those pesky, bourgeois details —script, defined characters, discernable plot— had yet to be accounted for. At this point our fledgling Kubrick announced an improvised sex scene (which I think we’d all agree is an unreasonable request even in real life). Telling the girl that her objective was to seduce the boy, he assured her that the boy would be resisting. Dramatic tension, see. But then —ha ha!— he told the boy that his objective was to seduce the girl, and…well, you get the idea. Bravo, sir. Manipulation worthy of Elia Kazan!
At this point he produced his little, ahem, camera.
Thank goodness for safe-words. The actors were savvy enough to spare their promising careers from grainy youtube scandals. The director, in his infinite sensitivity, responded to the walk-out by suggesting the girl’s sexual experience was the problem. Tragically, the real problem was eventually revealed to be the director’s own fornicative inadequacy. Bless.
The actors’ agents, descending like fairy godmothers, plucked their clients from the clammy palms of this peeping con. And they all lived happily ever after.
Except for the director, who received a righteous rollicking from two influential agents who won’t be dealing with him ever again.”
So this is my little paean to the unsung chivalry of theatre, where scenes of a sexual nature, for the most part, are sensitively staged. The collective nature of theatre acts as a safeguard against sweaty voyeurism — not to mention the fact that every stage manager I’ve ever worked with would clout a director for that sort of sleaze.
No, theatre’s much cleverer than that. Last year an actor who received lascivious, extra-marital texts from a well-known director used them to blackmail him into casting her in a big
Now that’s integrity. Oh, theatre, you canny minx.

